CORES

Processors 48 cores

Explore 31 processors with 48 physical cores. The index brings together different generations, platforms and performance levels that share this core count.

31 processors48-core

Selection guide

Choosing the right 48-core processor

This page groups 31 processors in the 48-core category. Use it to compare physical core count, but do not treat the count alone as a performance score; CPU Mark, single-thread speed, power use and your workload all matter.

3 brands 48–48 cores 81,490 average CPU Mark 200.00–400.00 W TDP

Practical answers

What does this count mean in real use?

Best-fit workloads

Most relevant to servers and specialized workstations running highly parallel virtualization, simulation, rendering or database workloads.

Is a higher count always better?

Not always. Higher counts help software that scales across parallel work, while a newer CPU with fewer cores or threads can win through stronger per-core speed, clocks and efficiency.

Expected power range

This page reports the actual recorded TDP range for the category. Core or thread count does not imply one power level: mobile, desktop and server processors operate under very different limits.

200–400 Waverage 297 W

Desktop versus server

Desktop CPUs balance responsiveness, clock speed and platform cost. Server CPUs prioritize parallel throughput, memory capacity, reliability features and sustained operation.

Server31

Match the workload

Gaming and everyday work need a balance of per-core speed and core count; rendering and simulation can use more parallel capacity.

Compare measured performance

Use CPU Mark for broad throughput and Single Thread for games and tasks sensitive to per-core speed.

Check the platform

Verify socket, motherboard, memory, power and cooling support before committing to a processor.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does an 48-core processor mean?

It has 48 physical CPU cores available for work. Thread count, clock speed and core design can still differ substantially between processors in the same category.

What is an 48-core CPU good for?

Most relevant to servers and specialized workstations running highly parallel virtualization, simulation, rendering or database workloads.

Is a 48-core CPU enough for gaming?

It depends on single-thread performance, processor generation, graphics card and the game. Compare CPU Mark, single-thread results and the full specifications before choosing.

Do more cores always make a CPU faster?

No. Rendering and heavily parallel work often benefit from more cores, while many games and applications depend more on per-core speed, clock behavior and architecture.

What is the difference between CPU cores and threads?

A core is a physical execution unit, while a thread is a logical work stream visible to the operating system. Simultaneous multithreading can improve utilization, but an extra thread is not a complete physical core.

Are 48-core CPUs desktop or server processors?

The same count can appear in desktop, workstation and server processors, but their architecture, power limits, memory features and socket design differ. Use the device-class breakdown on this page before comparing models.

How are processors ranked on this page?

The default order uses the available CPU Mark. You can also sort the catalog by core count or power from the controls above the list.

This summary is calculated from processor records linked to the category. Performance results are broad comparison indicators and can vary with system, power and cooling. Latest data update:

Processor catalog

48 cores

Showing 1–24 of 31

01CPUAMD EPYC 9475FAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.8 GHzTDP400 WCPU Mark122,11502CPUAMD EPYC 9455PAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.4 GHzTDP300 WCPU Mark116,81703CPUAMD EPYC 9455 EmbAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.1 GHzTDP—CPU Mark109,93904CPUAMD EPYC 9474FAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.1 GHzTDP360 WCPU Mark102,25505CPUIntel Xeon 6747PIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.9 GHzTDP330 WCPU Mark101,68506CPUIntel Xeon 6741PIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP300 WCPU Mark100,66007CPUIntel Xeon 678XIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.9 GHzTDP300 WCPU Mark98,55908CPUAMD EPYC 9454PAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP290 WCPU Mark94,68909CPUIntel Xeon Platinum 8558PIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.0 GHzTDP350 WCPU Mark91,87910CPUIntel Xeon Platinum 8488CIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP385 WCPU Mark88,66711CPUIntel Xeon 6740PIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP270 WCPU Mark88,06112CPUAMD EPYC 9454AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP290 WCPU Mark87,96113CPUAMD EPYC 7A23AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.7 GHzTDP—CPU Mark81,29614CPUAMD EPYC 7K23AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock—TDP—CPU Mark81,18315CPUIntel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+Intel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock4.0 GHzTDP350 WCPU Mark79,68316CPUAMD EPYC 7R13AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock—TDP—CPU Mark79,42017CPUAMD EPYC 7643PAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.6 GHzTDP225 WCPU Mark77,30718CPUAMD EPYC 7643AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.6 GHzTDP225 WCPU Mark76,25919CPUIntel Xeon Platinum 8461VIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.7 GHzTDP300 WCPU Mark74,98220CPUAMD EPYC 8434PAMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.1 GHzTDP200 WCPU Mark66,49021CPUIntel Xeon Platinum 8469CIntel · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.8 GHzTDP350 WCPU Mark64,51322CPUAMD EPYC 7R32AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.3 GHzTDP—CPU Mark63,96923CPUAMD EPYC 7642AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.3 GHzTDP225 WCPU Mark59,41324CPUAMD EPYC 7K62AMD · ServerCores / threads48 / 96Clock3.3 GHzTDP—CPU Mark58,822